Started By
Message

re: LeBron James and MJ at 31 years young

Posted on 6/20/16 at 10:40 am to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96757 posts
Posted on 6/20/16 at 10:40 am to
quote:

It's a fact that does matter. Why didn't the OP say "after XX years of playing in the NBA?"
Using seasons played makes absolutely no sense. Age is the numbrr 1 issue that drives retirement and the end of a career. So using that as a checkpoint makes the most sense. Also, using LeBrons seasons at the age of 18-20 against him is nonsense. Those years are development years just like MJs college years were.
Posted by Buckeye06
Member since Dec 2007
23168 posts
Posted on 6/20/16 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Using seasons played makes absolutely no sense. Age is the numbrr 1 issue that drives retirement and the end of a career. So using that as a checkpoint makes the most sense. Also, using LeBrons seasons at the age of 18-20 against him is nonsense. Those years are development years just like MJs college years were.


Ability to play the game is the #1 issue that drives retirement. That is often caused by age but it is often other things as well. Lots of 25 year olds are out of the NBA cause they aren't good enough.

If Jordan came out in 1982 instead of 84 who is to say he wouldn't have been a late first rounder and gone to the Lakers or Celtics and won 2 more as a role player? It's kind of insane how hard people try in this debate

Using NBA seasons, playing against NBA players, is the best checkpoint.

you probably count Ichiro's hits in Japan too

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram