- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: OJ Simpson: Made in America 30 for 30
Posted on 6/21/16 at 2:17 pm to Winkface
Posted on 6/21/16 at 2:17 pm to Winkface
quote:
Eh. She knows Simpson did it. She makes herself feel better by saying the prosecution screwed up. Goes to show how much of a role the personality of the attorneys plays in the courtroom. Look at the Casey Anthony trial. Jeff Ashton vs Cheney Mason. She fell for the Cochran charm. She was never going to rock the jury boat either. She clearly justifies is to herself by blaming the prosecution. Still no mention of actual evidence.
Her interview was edited, but she did mention evidence a few times. She talked about OJ trying on the glove and how that was a mistake. She said she could see the glove was big without the demo, but then when he tried it on, it didn't fit. She talked about something else, as well, but I can't recall what it was.
The prosecution was awful. Ito was awful. The police were awful. Fuhrman was awful. And, to this day, I still can't figure out how OJ got so lucky that he wasn't dripping with blood after those bloody horrific murders. I think that was just a lucky fluke for him. I don't think he could have planned it that way.
3
Posted on 6/21/16 at 3:14 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
The prosecution was awful. Ito was awful. The police were awful. Fuhrman was awful.
There are mistakes made in every criminal trial. Prosecutors are human. However, even with those mistakes, there are a lot of people rightfully convicted in cases with even less conclusive evidence than in the OJ case.
I think the documentary did a good job of showing that it is virtually a certainty that he did it, but he was acquitted largely because of the racial climate in LA at the time. That jury wanted OJ to "win". The defense just had to give them something to hang their hat on. Furman was a big part of that.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 3:39 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
The prosecution was awful. Ito was awful. The police were awful. Fuhrman was awful. And, to this day, I still can't figure out how OJ got so lucky that he wasn't dripping with blood after those bloody horrific murders. I think that was just a lucky fluke for him. I don't think he could have planned it that way.
There was that mysterious bag that Kardashian was seen carrying and was never seen again. It could have contained his clothes and the murder weapon. OTOH it doesn't explain the lack of blood in his bronco, unless he used another vehicle. Or the lack of blood in his shower drains, unless he cleaned up elsewhere.
Posted on 6/21/16 at 4:26 pm to Gris Gris
quote:
Ito was awful.
He was the worst, way too aware of the cameras - seemed awestruck by Cochran, let the defense get away with whatever they pretty much wanted.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News