Started By
Message

re: Measles outbreak in Arizona

Posted on 5/31/16 at 7:57 pm to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85476 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

You are looking at the fact that only 11 people are referenced. How many people do you think interacted with them in passing?




I'm sure it is quite high, but at an immigration detainee center, I'd imagine the majority of patrons are not immunized. As a result, I'd think there would be a widespread outbreak among the detainees and a few staffers here and there. Only 7 detainees and 4 staffers is still a win for immunizations, but it isn't exactly what I'd expect. Perhaps more like 25 detainees and 4 staffers, assuming all detainees were not immunized and all staffers had received immunization.

ETA: In no way am I even remotely anti-vaxx, but I just thought this would be a more pronounced "loss" for the unvaccinated individuals.
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 7:59 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71754 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:19 pm to
quote:


I'm sure it is quite high, but at an immigration detainee center, I'd imagine the majority of patrons are not immunized. As a result, I'd think there would be a widespread outbreak among the detainees and a few staffers here and there. Only 7 detainees and 4 staffers is still a win for immunizations, but it isn't exactly what I'd expect. Perhaps more like 25 detainees and 4 staffers, assuming all detainees were not immunized and all staffers had received immunization.

ETA: In no way am I even remotely anti-vaxx, but I just thought this would be a more pronounced "loss" for the unvaccinated individuals.


Sounds like the staffers need booster shots.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram