Started By
Message

re: Why don't we hear more about the Russians helping to end WWII in the Pacific?

Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:08 pm to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89768 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:08 pm to
It's a weird geopolitical question.

They did nothing to end the Pacific War except exist. They launched their offensive the same day as Fat Man (as you indicated).

But, one of the factors we considered in ending the war with the bombs (rather than firebombing until September/October) was to cut off Soviet justification for incursions into the China and Japanese spheres of influence.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

But, one of the factors we considered in ending the war with the bombs (rather than firebombing until September/October) was to cut off Soviet justification for incursions into the China and Japanese spheres of influence









This is the eight hundred pound gorilla in the room that people don't talk about. Probably influenced Truman's decision greatly.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

They launched their offensive the same day as Fat Man (as you indicated).

But, one of the factors we considered in ending the war with the bombs (rather than firebombing until September/October) was to cut off Soviet justification for incursions into the China and Japanese spheres of influence.


All true. That said, the Japanese also had to consider two factors:

1) Often forgotten today, Marshal Zhukov handed the Japanese Kwantung Army their collective arse in Manchuria in 1939 before he was recalled to fight the Germans.
2) The Japanese knew there was no way they'd stand a chance the second time around, with no ability to maintain a standing army in Manchuria.

So it was basically a cherry on top of everything else.
Posted by Emteein
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2011
3894 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

They did nothing to end the Pacific War except exist. They launched their offensive the same day as Fat Man (as you indicated).



I agree with this, but their existence in the war against Japan could be seen as equally as important as the atomic bombs. One way of looking at it is that Russian declaring war and then nearly immediately(61 minutes later) invading china was equivalent to a 3rd atomic bomb, a knockout blow to Japan. Surely if Russia never came along, we would have eventually finished off Japan, either by atomic bombing off the face of the earth or by invasion. Also, I don't believe this is taking anything away from what the US did in the pacific up to that point because we never would have gotten to this moment where the war would end, but we did request Russia's presence in the war with Japan.

quote:

It's a weird geopolitical question


It is surely a weird geopolitical question, if we do not ask for Russian to join in, does China become Communist? Does the Korean War still happen? Does Vietnam still happen?
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25346 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

But, one of the factors we considered in ending the war with the bombs (rather than firebombing until September/October) was to cut off Soviet justification for incursions into the China and Japanese spheres of influence.


I can't imagine that was true. Harry and FDR loved Uncle Joe. Harry gave away Europe, turned over dissidents to be killed, and led an apology tour on behalf of his buddy Uncle Joe. The idea that Truman/Roosevelt wanted to limit Soviet influence seems like a revisionist fairy tale to me, given the other crazy concessions Truman made.
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 2:14 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram