- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sources:Upgraded PlayStation 4 is Codenamed NEO, Contains Upgraded CPU, GPU, RAM
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:46 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Posted on 4/19/16 at 10:46 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
Developers are all pissed about this
They can be pissed, the days of 6-8 year console cycles are a thing of the past. Plenty have already talked about limitations on current consoles as well so it's not like everyone holds the same opinion. Developers are probably just upset they have to work on one more version now.
Posted on 4/20/16 at 12:11 pm to GalvoAg
quote:
They can be pissed, the days of 6-8 year console cycles are a thing of the past.
I wouldn't say they are a thing of the past, it's still a very viable enterprise. I think the problem is that they lost sight of the fact that for a console to have a long shelf-life, they have to accept the fact that they are going to lose money on it for the first half of that shelf-life.
I remember reading that the previous 2 generations didn't finally hit the black until like year 4 or 5 of their existence and it's because they used expensive parts in order to "future proof" the consoles. The current generation was already regarded as being behind the curve.
Now, I could be wrong on this, but the current consoles seem less prepared for the long haul than the previous 2 or 3 generations.
This post was edited on 4/20/16 at 12:23 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News