- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: WWII Thread: Lesser known aircraft that you like
Posted on 4/5/16 at 11:47 am to Count Chocula
Posted on 4/5/16 at 11:47 am to Count Chocula
quote:
F4
In its day, best in the sky (with a correctly trained pilot)
One of the best fighters of the war. But it almost never got to earn that title due to early teething troubles when it was first introduced. It was so bad the Navy rejected it and gave it to the Marines instead....
quote:
The U.S. Navy received its first production F4U-1 on 31 July 1942, but getting it into service proved difficult. The framed "birdcage" style canopy provided inadequate visibility for deck taxiing. Even more seriously, the machine had a nasty tendency to "bounce" on touchdown, which could cause it to miss the arresting hook and slam into the crash barrier, or even go out of control. The long "hose nose" visibility problem and the enormous torque of the Double Wasp engine also created operational problems.
Carrier qualification trials on the escort carrier USS Sangamon, on 25 September 1942, caused the U.S. Navy to release the type to the United States Marine Corps.[39] Early Navy pilots spoke disparagingly of the F4U as the "hog", "hosenose" or "bent-wing widow maker".[40] After all, the U.S. Navy still had the Grumman F6F Hellcat, which did not have the performance of the F4U but was a far better deck landing aircraft. The Marines needed a better fighter than the F4F Wildcat. For them, it was not as important that the F4U could be recovered aboard a carrier, as they usually flew from land bases. Growing pains aside, Marine Corps squadrons readily took to the radical new fighter: The Corsair would always be more of a USMC fighter than a USN fighter. The type was declared "ready for combat" at the end of 1942, though only qualified to operate from land bases until carrier qualification issues were worked out.
LINK
Posted on 4/5/16 at 1:11 pm to Darth_Vader
Speaking of the F4U, there's a 92-year-old retired Marine (20 year vet) pilot at the World War 2 Museum, Arthur Arceneaux. He flew the Corsair at Okinawa. I didn't realize Marine pilots could be carrier based until talking to him last month. Talking to him was the highlight of my visit, just blew me away.
Art's Story
Art's Story
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News