- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "9mm vs 40 sw" The great handgun debate
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:56 pm to ctiger69
Posted on 3/18/16 at 9:56 pm to ctiger69
The FBI has proven that the additional power is minimal and even with the additional training, their agents need the additional rounds vs "power".
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how so many posters know more than the FBI when it comes to ballistics.
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how so many posters know more than the FBI when it comes to ballistics.
3
Posted on 3/18/16 at 10:51 pm to Ice Cream Sammich
This may be a dumb question, but it's a serious one. Do you think the fbi is buying more 9mm to save money on ammo as well as a whole?
Posted on 3/19/16 at 2:15 am to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how so many posters know more than the FBI when it comes to ballistics.
I think I've dispatched more living things with my handguns than the average fbi agent has.
Then again, I prefer rounds that the "experts" say don't work. But if it'll dispatch a male hog, it'll kill a human.
Two of my exes are trauma surgeons, their worst handgun rounds they have worked on were .22 hollowpoints of all things.
Posted on 3/19/16 at 8:17 am to Ice Cream Sammich
quote:
For the life of me, I cannot figure out how so many posters know more than the FBI when it comes to ballistics.
That's because you aren't honestly assessing the responses as well as the complete picture of what the FBI decided with the 9mm. Your bias and unwillingness to examine what is actually being posted is your problem and nobody but you can correct that. You are focusing on ballistics to the exclusion of everything else, not even the FBI did that but you are trying to make it seem like they did. I've read that paper and several others related to it, you should do the same.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News