- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spinoff: Was Pelelieu the Biggest Waste of a Campaign in WWII?
Posted on 3/16/16 at 11:42 am to TigerFanInSouthland
Posted on 3/16/16 at 11:42 am to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
How exactly did our logistics get spread so thin over there? Was it just the sheer numbers we had over there? Or was it just the fact that France had the only ports? Did we even try to get a logistic train through Italy?
Well, it's a matter of port facilities and geography. We'd hoped to be able to use the port of Cherbourg which we captured not long after D-Day but the Germans did a fine job of wrecking the port to the point it was months before it was usable. In the meantime, virtually all supplies for the Allied armies on the Western Front has to come ashore at the Normandy beaches via the Mullberry Harbors we'd built as a temporary means of getting supplies ashore. While useful, these artificial harbors were simply never intended to be the main ports for the whole ETO. Then as the campaign progressed and the front moved further east away from the Normandy coast, supplies had to be moved further and further by means of what became known as the Red Ball Express. And even with all this effort, by late summer and early fall the allied Armies were still literally running out of gas.
Posted on 3/16/16 at 11:51 am to Darth_Vader
and didn't the Mulberry Harbors get virtually destroyed via insane weather? Which slowed down the Red Ball Express?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News