Started By
Message

re: Spinoff: Was Pelelieu the Biggest Waste of a Campaign in WWII?

Posted on 3/16/16 at 11:42 am to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64763 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 11:42 am to
quote:

How exactly did our logistics get spread so thin over there? Was it just the sheer numbers we had over there? Or was it just the fact that France had the only ports? Did we even try to get a logistic train through Italy?



Well, it's a matter of port facilities and geography. We'd hoped to be able to use the port of Cherbourg which we captured not long after D-Day but the Germans did a fine job of wrecking the port to the point it was months before it was usable. In the meantime, virtually all supplies for the Allied armies on the Western Front has to come ashore at the Normandy beaches via the Mullberry Harbors we'd built as a temporary means of getting supplies ashore. While useful, these artificial harbors were simply never intended to be the main ports for the whole ETO. Then as the campaign progressed and the front moved further east away from the Normandy coast, supplies had to be moved further and further by means of what became known as the Red Ball Express. And even with all this effort, by late summer and early fall the allied Armies were still literally running out of gas.
Posted by TigerFanInSouthland
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2012
28065 posts
Posted on 3/16/16 at 11:51 am to
and didn't the Mulberry Harbors get virtually destroyed via insane weather? Which slowed down the Red Ball Express?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram