Started By
Message

re: Homeowner for the win

Posted on 3/13/16 at 11:36 pm to
Posted by TigernMS12
Member since Jan 2013
5540 posts
Posted on 3/13/16 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

Do you not comprehend the word "confrontation" in the linked story? If he attacked her as she was trying to stop his criminal act on her property then SYG may come into play pretty easily. Your entire argument is moot because you fail to grasp that very important detail.


My argument was always that she simply couldn't say she was defending her property in response to a previous post. If you read my posts, you will see that I conceded a long time ago that I did not the extent of the "confrontation" and that it would change the scenario if it turned into a self-defense situation.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16729 posts
Posted on 3/13/16 at 11:47 pm to
quote:

My argument was always that she simply couldn't say she was defending her property in response to a previous post.


Your argument has no basis, you cited Mississippi statutes for something that occurred in another state. Had you framed your argument "Had this occurred in Mississippi..." you'd have a slightly better point here. She could very well defend her property and that is because other states not named Mississippi have such statutes and/or case histories to offer in defense of such an action.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram