Started By
Message

re: Mo really wants to get something off her chest.

Posted on 3/2/16 at 9:52 am to
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9345 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 9:52 am to
I really wish Mo the best of luck and hope she fulfills her goal of helping people, BUT...

Mo, you've already hammered on this rather odd point before. It's kind of tasteless, honestly.

It's perfectly fine to come out and say, "I support women maintaining their virginity as long as they can. I tried really hard to do it myself, and I had mixed results. I wish I was stronger then, because I have some feelings of regret about it now." And that's it. The graphic detail/innuendo offered here is unnecessary, especially for young readers, which is what I assume is the audience.

The whole blog post seems... fetishistic... as though Mo seems to enjoy talking about the topic in this peculiar way. True teachers don't talk to young people this way. It's... inappropriate given the audience.

Which is why it doesn't seem like that's the intended audience after all. I interpret this as Mo's attempt to tell us all, yet again, that we can't have her. That all you get/got is/was "a piece" of her at best, while she felt disgusted by you.

You've been had, Mo. You're married with a kid. You're on hardly anyone's "short-list" anymore. Which, I guess, is why you feel the need to, again, provide dirt on yourself for your own amusement. Stop it. Damn, woman.



Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
36298 posts
Posted on 3/2/16 at 11:44 am to
quote:


Mo, you've already hammered on this rather odd point before. It's kind of tasteless, honestly.

It's perfectly fine to come out and say, "I support women maintaining their virginity as long as they can. I tried really hard to do it myself, and I had mixed results. I wish I was stronger then, because I have some feelings of regret about it now." And that's it. The graphic detail/innuendo offered here is unnecessary, especially for young readers, which is what I assume is the audience.

The whole blog post seems... fetishistic... as though Mo seems to enjoy talking about the topic in this peculiar way. True teachers don't talk to young people this way. It's... inappropriate given the audience.

Which is why it doesn't seem like that's the intended audience after all. I interpret this as Mo's attempt to tell us all, yet again, that we can't have her. That all you get/got is/was "a piece" of her at best, while she felt disgusted by you.

You've been had, Mo. You're married with a kid. You're on hardly anyone's "short-list" anymore. Which, I guess, is why you feel the need to, again, provide dirt on yourself for your own amusement. Stop it. Damn, woman.


I was going to post something, but this pretty much mirrors my thoughts.


Her choice of words lean more to "look at me" than "this is my journey and the missteps along the way"

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram