Started By
Message

re: Fighting an open field battle with only melee weapons, like Braveheart

Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:26 am to
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:26 am to
Brave and stupid. There were better ways of fighting wars in that age, that just didn't think outside the box.

...of course I say that with 20/20 hindsight vision, but it's mindboggling that someone said, after witnessing one battle fought in that manner, "Hey lets fight another battle like that."
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101938 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Brave and stupid. There were better ways of fighting wars in that age, that just didn't think outside the box.

...of course I say that with 20/20 hindsight vision, but it's mindboggling that someone said, after witnessing one battle fought in that manner, "Hey lets fight another battle like that."


Battles like that (at least similar style, open confrontation) were still being fought far later in history than medieval times.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83859 posts
Posted on 3/1/16 at 12:25 pm to
I don't understand how they did it. And don't say they were men back then. People get tired. A 3 minutes fist fight is exhausting. A 20 minutes fist fight is probably impossible. Running around, holding a 100 pound shield, swinging a 70+ point sword...? What? How can anyone do that for even an hour?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram