Started By
Message

re: Was Hitler any worse than Alexanderthe Great , Caesar, ect...?

Posted on 2/12/16 at 7:53 am to
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21577 posts
Posted on 2/12/16 at 7:53 am to
This is silly, American Indians didn't have the population you are speaking of by a factor of at least a 1000.

Mao, is by far the go to guy in term of numbers of people killed.
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 2/12/16 at 8:02 am to
quote:

American Indians didn't have the population you are speaking of by a factor of at least a 1000.


quote:

Scholars have varied widely on the estimated size of the indigenous populations prior to colonization and on the effects of European contact.[3] Estimates are made by extrapolations from small bits of data. In 1976, geographer William Denevan used the existing estimates to derive a "consensus count" of about 54 million people


18 million in continental US, now how many are there?
Posted by Methuselah
On da Riva
Member since Jan 2005
23350 posts
Posted on 2/12/16 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Mao, is by far the go to guy in term of numbers of people killed.



Just to illustrate how different people will defend just about anybody, this is from the Wikipedia article on Mao:

quote:

Supporters credit him with driving imperialism out of China,[3] modernising China and building it into a world power, promoting the status of women, improving education and health care, and increasing life expectancy as China's population grew from around 550 million to over 900 million during the period of his leadership.


Wikipedia Mao article

So, I guess the theory is he was a net positive on the population?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram