Started By
Message

re: OT Workout crew: What am I doing wrong?

Posted on 2/3/16 at 3:05 pm to
Posted by thibtigerfan
Thibodaux
Member since Aug 2006
2460 posts
Posted on 2/3/16 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Source? Other than some science-bro?



LINK

"A 1000 calorie deficit (or excess) per day will add up to 2 pounds lost (or gained) in a week. However, creating such a large deficit every day may be difficult and counterproductive. Remember that cutting calories too quickly and/or too much will slow your metabolic rate. The American College of Sports Medicine warns that calorie levels should never drop below 1200 calories/day for women or 1800/day for men; even these levels are very low."



But I know...."broscience"
Posted by Dan Bilzerian
..on my yacht or jet.
Member since Dec 2014
1864 posts
Posted on 2/3/16 at 3:09 pm to
Eating clean at 2,000 calories and running at 3,000 calories per day burned would be somewhat counter-productive.

Sure, you would shed 2lbs per week, but your body would be burning more than just carbs/fat as energy.

Eat a clean 2,500-3,000 cals, burn 3,000-3,500 per day, and you would get better results in the end.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/3/16 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

"A 1000 calorie deficit (or excess) per day will add up to 2 pounds lost (or gained) in a week. However, creating such a large deficit every day may be difficult and counterproductive. Remember that cutting calories too quickly and/or too much will slow your metabolic rate. The American College of Sports Medicine warns that calorie levels should never drop below 1200 calories/day for women or 1800/day for men; even these levels are very low."



Can you find the actual study. How long was the study conducted? What was their diet? How many people tool place in the study? What were their ages? We're they in shape or out of shape?

Your metabolism will obviously decrease if you're eating less food and losing weight...

Here's the one from earlier this week:

LINK

quote:

We used a single-blind, randomized, parallel-group prospective trial. During a 4-wk period, we provided hypoenergetic (~40% reduction compared with requirements) diets providing 33 ± 1 kcal/kg LBM to young men who were randomly assigned (n = 20/group) to consume either a lower-protein (1.2 g · kg-1 · d-1) control diet (CON) or a higher-protein (2.4 g · kg-1 · d-1) diet (PRO). All subjects performed resistance exercise training combined with high-intensity interval training for 6 d/wk. A 4-compartment model assessment of body composition was made pre- and postintervention.



quote:

CONCLUSIONS:
Our results showed that, during a marked energy deficit, consumption of a diet containing 2.4 g protein · kg-1 · d-1 was more effective than consumption of a diet containing 1.2 g protein · kg-1 · d-1 in promoting increases in LBM and losses of fat mass when combined with a high volume of resistance and anaerobic exercise. Changes in serum cortisol were associated with changes in body fat and LBM, but did not explain much variance in either measure. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01776359.
This post was edited on 2/3/16 at 3:37 pm
Posted by Artie Rome
Hwy 1
Member since Jul 2014
8757 posts
Posted on 2/3/16 at 3:48 pm to
Well I can agree that substantial muscle loss reduces your BMR. But to say eating 1800 kcals a day slows down your metabolism is a comopletely different thing, bro.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram