Started By
Message

re: A recreational car purchase: test drove a 2016 Mustang GT

Posted on 2/1/16 at 11:57 pm to
Posted by grif82
Member since Aug 2008
8151 posts
Posted on 2/1/16 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

Yeah, Ford SCCA track cars were beating the shite out of BMW's so badly that BMW demanded they put a weight penalty on the Mustangs. Mustangs continued to beat them. Don't think you know how well dialed in the chassis and suspension is on the current gen Mustangs.


Truth. Chevy and Ford deserve a lot of credit for putting cars on the market that can put up similar track times as some of the Euro cars such as the M3 or M4.

One of the biggest bang for the buck out there is the $33~k performance packaged base Mustang GT that includes the big Brembo brakes and Torsen rear diff. Take that and for a few grand add some extra suspension goodies and stickier tires. Also add headers, exhaust, CAI, and tune if you're willing to void your powertrain warranty. Now you have a 440-450ish RWHP car that handles like its on rails for under $40k.



This post was edited on 2/2/16 at 1:14 am
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16740 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 12:09 am to
One thing the Mustang has above any competitor is aftermarket support.
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31964 posts
Posted on 2/2/16 at 6:15 am to
That's exactly the car I drove yesterday. $35k sticker with the performance package but it had the stickier tires.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram