- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should basketball coaches be able to decline free throws?
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:12 am to Asphodel
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:12 am to Asphodel
You don't get it. Down 8 with a minute left, and I'm lunging for that ball willy nilly. Most likely I'll foul you, but so what? A foul doesn't hurt me here.
See the problem?
See the problem?
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:15 am to ballscaster
quote:
Most likely I'll foul you, but so what? A foul doesn't hurt me here.
You can't ignore that it will add to your foul total. You keep saying it as if it's some small, insignificant thing, but it isn't.
Posted on 1/27/16 at 11:19 am to ballscaster
quote:If you are lunging for the ball, then that's not an off-the-ball foul. On-ball fouls in the penalty are always free throws.
You don't get it. Down 8 with a minute left, and I'm lunging for that ball willy nilly. Most likely I'll foul you, but so what? A foul doesn't hurt me here.
See the problem?
I assume we're talking about trying to eliminate the "hack-a" strategy from the game, and only talking about off-ball fouls.
This post was edited on 1/27/16 at 11:21 am
Posted on 1/27/16 at 12:18 pm to ballscaster
quote:
You don't get it. Down 8 with a minute left, and I'm lunging for that ball willy nilly. Most likely I'll foul you, but so what? A foul doesn't hurt me here.
See the problem?
A foul puts a player in jeopardy of being disqualified, for one. Also, the opposing coach, assuming he declines the FTs STILL HAS TO INBOUND THE BALL. In late game situations that often leads to turnovers.
Not to mention the coach of the team who is up can choose to shoot them. It's weighing the risk/reward of either having to inbound the ball with no chance at any points vs. taking a shot for a point or two but them not being guaranteed.
A more logical objection would simply be that the same amount of fouls would be committed, it's just that those fouls would potentially be followed by a constant set of inbounds attempts. What's more exciting, watching a guy try to make a FT or two, or the team that's down attempting to get a five second call or turnover on the inbound?
This post was edited on 1/27/16 at 12:22 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News