- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gating canals in houma area
Posted on 1/28/16 at 8:43 am to AlxTgr
Posted on 1/28/16 at 8:43 am to AlxTgr
quote:
It's really amazing how poorly you understand this. You're creating unicorns for an irrelevant argument you don't understand.
I don't know you so I'm not going to tell you what you do and don't understand. But it does seem highly unlikely you grasp that ownership of water and ownership of a river bed and bank can be completely separate.
I'm not implying that every stream that is "navigable" today is subject to the public's use. However, as I stated before, to state that "navigability" has no meaning, in the legal sense, is just plain wrong.
ETA: I'll stick with Yippi on this one.
This post was edited on 1/28/16 at 8:45 am
1
Posted on 1/28/16 at 8:59 am to Mr Wonderful
quote:Not in this context. We aren't talking water rights in here. Your strawman ability is above average.
I don't know you so I'm not going to tell you what you do and don't understand. But it does seem highly unlikely you grasp that ownership of water and ownership of a river bed and bank can be completely separate.
quote:No, no it's not. I'm waiting for an example.
I'm not implying that every stream that is "navigable" today is subject to the public's use. However, as I stated before, to state that "navigability" has no meaning, in the legal sense, is just plain wrong.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News