Started By
Message

re: Pete Rose not to be reinstated

Posted on 12/14/15 at 2:07 pm to
Posted by Keltic Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2006
19442 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 2:07 pm to
Rose was the type gambler, well documented, who would literally bet on almost anything, from dog racing to number of hit/runs in a game/inning, everything to do with pro & college football, pro & college basketball. Yet, he never bet that his team would lose with all the inside information he had in front of him, game to game.He only bet on them to win. Yea. OK.
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38044 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Yet, he never bet that his team would lose with all the inside information he had in front of him, game to game.He only bet on them to win. Yea.


And, knowing that he had a bet TO WIN a certain game, do you think it ever crossed his mind to leave a starter in a little too long? Or managed his lineup in detriment of the team but in support of his BET?

Y'all seem to think that just because he bet ON his team that he and his team couldn't be negatively influenced by that bet. Stop deluding yourself.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

Yet, he never bet that his team would lose with all the inside information he had in front of him, game to game.He only bet on them to win. Yea. OK.


I think you are saying he DID bet on his team to lose. and you are right.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram