- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rumor: Houston Rockets seeing if there is a trade market for Ty Lawson
Posted on 12/1/15 at 8:59 pm to Boomshockalocka
Posted on 12/1/15 at 8:59 pm to Boomshockalocka
quote:Gets healthy? Besides Donatas Motiejunas, who is an average player, who else needs to get healthy? You could say that about a number of teams too, and some teams have an opportunity to even gain more in the health department (Cavs).
When HOU gets healthy and meshes
And meshing? It's not like you have a brand new core of players (like the Heat in 2010-2011, Houston a couple years back, and Cavs last year). Again, you could say the same thing about most of the league.
quote:In order to have an .900 win percentage against a .300 team, the Rockets would have to be a .800 team and a .830 team to beat a .350 team 9 out of 10.
.300 team 9 times of 10 and they'll beat the .350 team 9 times out of 10
In other words, the only team that would likely win 9/10 is Golden State, and Houston isn't anywhere near the Spurs, Cavs, and a handful of other teams, let alone the Warriors.
Again, there is no basis for our 9 out 10 prediction whatsoever. It's not even logical
This post was edited on 12/1/15 at 9:00 pm
Posted on 12/1/15 at 9:08 pm to buckeye_vol
Well D12 is about to start playing every night, that obviously makes a difference. Beverley has only played in a little more than a handful of games this season( I don't mean 5 literally, this is where I know you'll go look it up and point out that he's played in more games than that you stickler you). That's 3 starters from last years team that will soon be in the lineup every night who haven't been up until now.
Exaclty, which is why they'll play better when they get the 3 starters from last season playing every night. Which means that they HAVE been playing with new players this season up until now. Maybe you should familiarize yourself with the team before you try to act like you know what you're talking about. You rarely if ever see me commenting on CLE. Why? They aren't my team and I don't watch them every night.
OK whats the odds GSW wins 9/10 v a .300 team v a .350 team?
quote:
And meshing? It's not like you have a brand new core of players
Exaclty, which is why they'll play better when they get the 3 starters from last season playing every night. Which means that they HAVE been playing with new players this season up until now. Maybe you should familiarize yourself with the team before you try to act like you know what you're talking about. You rarely if ever see me commenting on CLE. Why? They aren't my team and I don't watch them every night.
quote:
In other words, the only team that would likely win 9/10 is Golden State,
OK whats the odds GSW wins 9/10 v a .300 team v a .350 team?
Posted on 12/1/15 at 9:19 pm to buckeye_vol
8 different starting lineups in 18 games.
meshing? Meshing?
yea the same squad has been together all year.
meshing? Meshing?
yea the same squad has been together all year.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News