- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why do you want to fire Les, because I don't get it.
Posted on 11/24/15 at 3:19 pm to Vindibudd
Posted on 11/24/15 at 3:19 pm to Vindibudd
It's this simple...if you're LSU, can you (right now) hire someone that can deliver better results for the next 5-9 years than what Miles could do?
Based on what Miles has shown the last 3-5 years, many believe (right now) the answer is yes and the fear is that if you wait, the ability to recruit at the level we are currently recruiting will not be there and the selection of coaches will not be there.
2007, 20011, 110-32, etc doesn't matter
When a professional player gets cut or traded because he organization thinks they can get better production moving forward, nobody thinks it's a bad move. The packers moved on from Favre to Rodgers because they felt that would have better results. It doesn't diminish what Favre did nor does it mean Rodgers had to be better than what Favre WAS. It simply meant he had to be better than what Favre would have been if they kept him.
Based on what Miles has shown the last 3-5 years, many believe (right now) the answer is yes and the fear is that if you wait, the ability to recruit at the level we are currently recruiting will not be there and the selection of coaches will not be there.
2007, 20011, 110-32, etc doesn't matter
When a professional player gets cut or traded because he organization thinks they can get better production moving forward, nobody thinks it's a bad move. The packers moved on from Favre to Rodgers because they felt that would have better results. It doesn't diminish what Favre did nor does it mean Rodgers had to be better than what Favre WAS. It simply meant he had to be better than what Favre would have been if they kept him.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News