- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anyone receive a notice from La Dept of Public Safety about their car insurance?
Posted on 10/19/15 at 7:18 pm to White Roach
Posted on 10/19/15 at 7:18 pm to White Roach
quote:nope. That's what I thought. It's $128 for not answering the "first letter".
If you get a letter, I'm sure you'll be able to show the vehicle was registered and insured in TN within days of your LA coverage being dropped.
Posted on 10/19/15 at 8:52 pm to drexyl
The old phantom first letter trick. Louisiana at its finest right here.
Has any news outlets picked up this scam yet? I don't live in the state, so I have no idea. I have been checking the Nola.com and Baton Rouge advocate websites but have yet to see anything mentioned.
Has any news outlets picked up this scam yet? I don't live in the state, so I have no idea. I have been checking the Nola.com and Baton Rouge advocate websites but have yet to see anything mentioned.
Posted on 10/20/15 at 9:21 am to drexyl
quote:
If you get a letter, I'm sure you'll be able to show the vehicle was registered and insured in TN within days of your LA coverage being dropped.
nope. That's what I thought. It's $128 for not answering the "first letter".
-------------------------------------------------------------
I'm applying logic and reason in my analysis of the situation. I also realize that the LA Legislature and OMV are involved, which makes the issue much more problematic.
However, if you never had a lapse in liability insurance coverage, which I assume to be true in Bottomland Brew's case, you haven't broken the law. If the first letter was sent in error (if it was even sent at all), how can you be held responsible for the fine?
If you moved to a different and registered your vehicle there in a timely manner, you or your insurance company should be able to provide an adequate paper trail. If you sold or junked a vehicle in LA, it may be trickier.
If you get a letter, I'm sure you'll be able to show the vehicle was registered and insured in TN within days of your LA coverage being dropped.
nope. That's what I thought. It's $128 for not answering the "first letter".
-------------------------------------------------------------
I'm applying logic and reason in my analysis of the situation. I also realize that the LA Legislature and OMV are involved, which makes the issue much more problematic.
However, if you never had a lapse in liability insurance coverage, which I assume to be true in Bottomland Brew's case, you haven't broken the law. If the first letter was sent in error (if it was even sent at all), how can you be held responsible for the fine?
If you moved to a different and registered your vehicle there in a timely manner, you or your insurance company should be able to provide an adequate paper trail. If you sold or junked a vehicle in LA, it may be trickier.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News