- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 2/22/16 at 9:40 am to dj30
Posted on 2/22/16 at 9:40 am to dj30
quote:
Vanilla knew what was up, thats why,he was making adds like a mad man. He was trying to keep up with your boy but he couldnt.
Because it was said that a 3 way tie would go to points. So he was trying to either win or beat you in points. He did not know that Los Lobos would get beat until the last day and Lobos had him beat on points. Once Los Lobos lost, his win should have been a moot point. Like you said yesterday.
Additionally, if Lobos would not have gotten beat, there would have been no clear hierarchy of head-to-head I believe. 3 way A beat B beat C beat A triangles would necessitate that the next tiebreaker be used. So of course he was trying like hell to win/accumulate points for a potential tiebreaker. But he still should be in based on the stated rules as of Lobos loss. Unless I'm ignorant to where the tiebreaker was stated to be something other than head to head.
This post was edited on 2/22/16 at 9:50 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)