- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/28/15 at 11:05 am to LNCHBOX
In this case it's not the gun law but perhaps the gun owner's discretion in question. He's not in danger and blasts? Fine w me the crook took one to the dome but this actor will face huge punishments if only exhorbinant defense bills. He will be affected 1000 times more than the "victim" and car owner in this case.
This post was edited on 9/28/15 at 11:06 am
Posted on 9/28/15 at 11:53 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Yea, let's use one outlier example to make an argument about regulating guns.
This!
Although it's unfortunate that this "friendly fire" event occurred, it's does not absolve the fact that this wouldn't have occurred if not for the criminal act in the first place - the blame still lies solely on the perpetrators, not the Good Samaritan.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News