- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Settle debate, better talent-outfielders or infielders
Posted on 9/14/15 at 12:37 am
Posted on 9/14/15 at 12:37 am
In terms of MLB. Outfielders because they have more ways they have to field the ball.
The other argument is infielders can outfield but outfielders can't infield and that 1st is an easy slugger position.
The other argument is infielders can outfield but outfielders can't infield and that 1st is an easy slugger position.
2
Posted on 9/14/15 at 1:08 am to PJ250R
From my experience with baseball it is much easier to transition to the outfield than any infield position. Playing in the infield has very little margin for error at the highest levels.
Posted on 9/14/15 at 1:27 am to PJ250R
Finding guys with the range to play the OF is not hard. Its far more difficult to find guys with powerful and deadly accurate arms who can play SS, 3B and C.
And all that said catcher is by far the hardest position to field.
And all that said catcher is by far the hardest position to field.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News