- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reasons to veto a trade (All discussion here)
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:54 am to oleyeller
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:54 am to oleyeller
The issue is when and how you determine collusion. This isn't a definite thing. You can only go off of suggestions and evidence. Is the trade so lopsided to where it doesn't make sense? What is the relationship between the partners? Where in the season are we, and is it possible for both teams to make the playoffs? Etc. There are various factors to consider, and none of them are definite besides an actual admission.
In theory, yes, collusion is the only reason to veto. In practice things are more difficult to figure out.
In theory, yes, collusion is the only reason to veto. In practice things are more difficult to figure out.
This post was edited on 9/2/15 at 10:58 am
2
Posted on 9/2/15 at 10:59 am to Peazey
"Collusion" is the biggest myth in fantasy sports.
Posted on 9/2/15 at 11:02 am to Peazey
quote:
The issue is when and how you determine collusion. This isn't a definite thing. You can only go off of suggestions and evidence. Is the trade so lopsided to where it doesn't make sense? What is the relationship between the partners? Where in the season are we, and is it possible for both teams to make the playoffs?
I would agree to these and add "borrowing players". Obviously, you can't tell beforehand, but I would not allow the 2nd trade to take place.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News