- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Worse movie: Furious 7 or the Dukes of Hazard?
Posted on 8/31/15 at 1:50 pm to Phil A Sheo
Posted on 8/31/15 at 1:50 pm to Phil A Sheo
quote:
quote:
Furious 7
quote:
when they're on TV
When was Furious 7 on TV??? It just came up on my amazon prime..
Argument is invalid
thats fair... Watched it once on a plane going to Amsterdam. Once again on some free hotel channel here in Abu Dhabi.
Don't care how much the movies made... It was terrible acting, terrible dialogue, and terribly edited.
Great action sequences, and fun to watch. But still terrible.
2
Posted on 8/31/15 at 2:05 pm to Floating Change Up
quote:
It was terrible acting,
Meh.. they aren't going to win any awards..
quote:
terrible dialogue, and terribly edited.
I would assume that could have something to do with Paul Walkers death during middle of filming and having to figure some things out..
quote:
Great action sequences, and fun to watch.
That's the reason these movies are made.
Posted on 8/31/15 at 2:11 pm to Floating Change Up
quote:Wait, did you watch a Fast and Furious film expecting some Oscar-worthy script and performances? You're just an idiot. It's fricking Fast and Furious, it's pure testosterone molecularly modified into film.
It was terrible acting, terrible dialogue, and terribly edited.
And fwiw I thought the editing on Furious 7 was awesome considering the set of circumstances they were dealt.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News