- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Negative vs. Positive vs. Realistic
Posted on 8/20/15 at 7:49 pm to ell_13
Posted on 8/20/15 at 7:49 pm to ell_13
Using "or" statements means you really are in the same boat I am. Just looking at the end record, 3 losses seems realistic but it hard to pin down exactly which 3 you think we would lose.
For example, by saying "Carolina or Florida" you are saying we could lose to both of those teams since they are independent. Following that logic train means you think it is realistic we lose 5 games.
For example, by saying "Carolina or Florida" you are saying we could lose to both of those teams since they are independent. Following that logic train means you think it is realistic we lose 5 games.
Posted on 8/20/15 at 8:09 pm to FlyingTiger06
quote:True. We really weren't that far off.
Using "or" statements means you really are in the same boat I am.
quote:
3 losses seems realistic but it hard to pin down exactly which 3 you think we would lose.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconcheers.gif)
quote:Not really. We "could" lose 7 games if you look at each individually. I just think we lost one of those games.
For example, by saying "Carolina or Florida" you are saying we could lose to both of those teams since they are independent. Following that logic train means you think it is realistic we lose 5 games.
This post was edited on 8/20/15 at 8:12 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)