Started By
Message

re: Starting Poche was the correct decision, even in hindsight

Posted on 6/15/15 at 8:04 am to
Posted by texastigerr
Texas
Member since Jan 2005
8311 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 8:04 am to
quote:

Not true. Sorry. You pitch your freaking ACE


This is right and I said it as soon as I heard the decision not to pitch our ACE game 1. Game 1 is the most important game of the series. You take your best shot at game one. How many times have you ever seen a major league team not pitch their ace the first game of a playoff series when they are able to set their rotation? And pitching your ACE early gives you a better chance of bringing him back later. In this case we have a guy with a sub 2 ERA. The chances of winning when your offense produces only 3 runs is much greater. We have seen this throughout the season. You don't think TCU was that much more pumped when they saw they would not face Lange. You don't play for game 2 in a double elimination tournament. CPM was wrong and it sends the wrong message to your players and your number 1 pitcher. Oh and can we please stop making the third out at the plate. Another fundamental rule that CPM and this staff doesn't seem to care about.
Posted by CheerWhine
A little bit of Mardi Gras
Member since Apr 2014
74214 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 8:14 am to
Because a best-of-7 series is exactly the same as a 4-team double elimination bracket... you have to win both of the first two to gain any real advantage. If we win tomorrow with Lange, we're still in the same spot as if we'd beaten TCU with Lange and lost tomorrow with Poche. CPM pitched the two in the order that gave us the best chance to win both. Starting Poche was the right call, even though it didn't work out. Now leaving him in that long, that's another story.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram