quote:

Yeah, but...why?

I'm the first to say, hey, I enjoy boobs, but, damn. What value is that scene? In what way does it actually advance anything? If he's just not poisoned, you're at the same point you're at now. It's not like he's going to swear allegiance or a debt to them. That scene was stupid and pointless.

Hopefully the writers have a purpose for it that proves me wrong.

What do they need from Bronn? They want Lannisters dead, he could help with that either by lieing about their intentions being there or killing jaime.

Maybe she actually gave him another poison to kill him, who knows, it's certainly in there for a reason though

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Matisyeezy

End of the bar, Drunk

Member since Feb 2012

16624 posts

Posted on 5/25/15 at 10:29 pm to Mizzoufan26

quote:
What do they need from Bronn? They want Lannisters dead, he could help with that either by lieing about their intentions being there or killing jaime.

Maybe she actually gave him another poison to kill him, who knows, it's certainly in there for a reason though

If we assume it's a valid antidote, there's no real value. And I feel like we have to. Why the frick would you give him ANOTHER poison? He was already dead. He was clearly poisoned. You could assume it was a hallucinogenic poison, but then you have to ask why the frick you would use such a slow acting hallucinogenic poison. It had to be lethal. Anything else is nonsensical.

Maybe your first point stands, but it's pretty weak. I agree insofar as "Who benefits?" but that's the question of the whole scene. How does this advance anything. It feels like another instance where there isn't shite in place in regards to story so writers are just kinda...throwing shite against the wall.

4 ...

Report Post

Movie/TV Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board