Started By
Message

re: Inspection checkpoint at hundred oaks

Posted on 4/29/15 at 8:24 am to
Posted by iAmBatman
The Batcave
Member since Mar 2011
12382 posts
Posted on 4/29/15 at 8:24 am to
An increased police presence in a neighborhood doesn't reduce crime?

I'd be happy about it if i lived in Hundred Oaks (unless I was stupid and didn't get my inspection sticker renewed)
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
20979 posts
Posted on 4/29/15 at 8:26 am to
quote:

An increased police presence in a neighborhood doesn't reduce crime?


Do you really believe they are there to reduce crime? Come on- look its even the end of the month.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
57511 posts
Posted on 4/29/15 at 8:26 am to
quote:

An increased police presence in a neighborhood doesn't reduce crime




Posted by Sandy_Ash
Member since Feb 2015
1162 posts
Posted on 4/29/15 at 8:27 am to
quote:

An increased police presence in a neighborhood doesn't reduce crime?

I'd be happy about it if i lived in Hundred Oaks (unless I was stupid and didn't get my inspection sticker renewed)


You could rob the house right behind the checkpoint and I doubt the cops would notice
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22364 posts
Posted on 4/29/15 at 8:36 am to
quote:

An increased police presence in a neighborhood doesn't reduce crime?

Which is more effective at reducing crime: 1. Police presence in high crime area or 2. Inspection checkpoints in low crime areas? Now which one generates more revenue for the city?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram