- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Reach for Perryman at 31?
Posted on 4/29/15 at 1:38 am to Harry Pitts
Posted on 4/29/15 at 1:38 am to Harry Pitts
Perryman is a thumper who will automatically add toughness to your defense. But you better believe he will be some type of liability in coverage. So for me its reach.
As for myself, I really like Dawson . There is no LB more instinctive or that has produced more. And that includes Kendricks. I know many people say that Kendricks is the best coverage LBer but I would argue that Dawson had more interceptions and pass breakups than the UCLA LBer. In fact Dawson produced more than Kendricks in all stats except tackles(13 more than Dawson).
Yet I would still hesitate to select Dawson at 31 because of his red flags(minor IMO) and disappointing combine, although he did improve at his pro day. But at 44 he would be my guy.
As for myself, I really like Dawson . There is no LB more instinctive or that has produced more. And that includes Kendricks. I know many people say that Kendricks is the best coverage LBer but I would argue that Dawson had more interceptions and pass breakups than the UCLA LBer. In fact Dawson produced more than Kendricks in all stats except tackles(13 more than Dawson).
Yet I would still hesitate to select Dawson at 31 because of his red flags(minor IMO) and disappointing combine, although he did improve at his pro day. But at 44 he would be my guy.
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News