Started By
Message

re: Bizarre Math Question and Answer breaks the internet - Sorry if already posted

Posted on 4/15/15 at 8:00 pm to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85489 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

Or it can be read as positive one combined with negative two using addition. I feel the second scenario is more useful when you get deeper into math.



Continuing with that logic, the OP can be read as 48 times .5 times (9+3), right?


Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63572 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 8:03 pm to
I read it as (-1 times -48) times ((1/2) times 1) times (3+9) because I see the argument within the argument within the argument.
Posted by KG6
Member since Aug 2009
10920 posts
Posted on 4/15/15 at 8:12 pm to
Yes I'm not arguing against either method. But if you multiply the .5 across the argument is parenthesis before applying it to 48, you end up with a different answer. Therefore the only way to say 288 without any doubt is to fall back on left to right.

I'm not exactly sober right now, so i have no clue of this is making sense
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram