- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bizarre Math Question and Answer breaks the internet - Sorry if already posted
Posted on 4/15/15 at 8:00 pm to KG6
Posted on 4/15/15 at 8:00 pm to KG6
quote:
Or it can be read as positive one combined with negative two using addition. I feel the second scenario is more useful when you get deeper into math.
Continuing with that logic, the OP can be read as 48 times .5 times (9+3), right?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/icons/iconpopcorn.gif)
Posted on 4/15/15 at 8:03 pm to slackster
I read it as (-1 times -48) times ((1/2) times 1) times (3+9) because I see the argument within the argument within the argument.
Posted on 4/15/15 at 8:12 pm to slackster
Yes I'm not arguing against either method. But if you multiply the .5 across the argument is parenthesis before applying it to 48, you end up with a different answer. Therefore the only way to say 288 without any doubt is to fall back on left to right.
I'm not exactly sober right now, so i have no clue of this is making sense![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
I'm not exactly sober right now, so i have no clue of this is making sense
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)