- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zach Lowe on Potential Summer Pels Trade
Posted on 4/4/15 at 3:48 pm to 42
Posted on 4/4/15 at 3:48 pm to 42
quote:
When a rookie scale contract benefits the team under the current CBA, the differential benefit were the cap higher is only a very slight improvement in comparison to the direct benefit due to the indentured servitude itself.
Good point. It's not as big an advantage when you break it down by % of cap. And I love this sentence. Interesting way of putting rookie scale contracts; you opposed to them on that basis or just "a spade is a spade?"
1
Posted on 4/5/15 at 10:36 pm to corndeaux
I am actually a supporter of them. They are not perfect, but they accomplish a number of things. The "Rose Rule" helped, for instance.
It is some dues paying from the player perspective.
I get annoyed with the blind, over-the-top, reactionary love for them.
It is some dues paying from the player perspective.
I get annoyed with the blind, over-the-top, reactionary love for them.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News