- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Zach Lowe on Potential Summer Pels Trade
Posted on 4/4/15 at 12:01 pm to corndeaux
Posted on 4/4/15 at 12:01 pm to corndeaux
quote:
I assume you're referring specifically to the Pels and not in general. That may be true short term for the Pels, but getting 3 or 4 years of production above contract value is worthwhile endeavor. It's not a necessity, but it is something I would be interested in this year and beyond as a team runner.
When a rookie scale contract benefits the team under the current CBA, the differential benefit were the cap higher is only a very slight improvement in comparison to the direct benefit due to the indentured servitude itself.
Generally, not just for the Pels, and this is less true for the few top picks that command high salary.
Posted on 4/4/15 at 3:48 pm to 42
quote:
When a rookie scale contract benefits the team under the current CBA, the differential benefit were the cap higher is only a very slight improvement in comparison to the direct benefit due to the indentured servitude itself.
Good point. It's not as big an advantage when you break it down by % of cap. And I love this sentence. Interesting way of putting rookie scale contracts; you opposed to them on that basis or just "a spade is a spade?"
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)