Started By
Message

re: Zach Lowe on Potential Summer Pels Trade

Posted on 4/4/15 at 12:01 pm to
Posted by 42
Member since Apr 2012
3703 posts
Posted on 4/4/15 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

I assume you're referring specifically to the Pels and not in general. That may be true short term for the Pels, but getting 3 or 4 years of production above contract value is worthwhile endeavor. It's not a necessity, but it is something I would be interested in this year and beyond as a team runner.


When a rookie scale contract benefits the team under the current CBA, the differential benefit were the cap higher is only a very slight improvement in comparison to the direct benefit due to the indentured servitude itself.

Generally, not just for the Pels, and this is less true for the few top picks that command high salary.
Posted by corndeaux
Member since Sep 2009
9634 posts
Posted on 4/4/15 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

When a rookie scale contract benefits the team under the current CBA, the differential benefit were the cap higher is only a very slight improvement in comparison to the direct benefit due to the indentured servitude itself.


Good point. It's not as big an advantage when you break it down by % of cap. And I love this sentence. Interesting way of putting rookie scale contracts; you opposed to them on that basis or just "a spade is a spade?"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram