Started By
Message

re: Interstellar - things you LOVED and HATED about this movie

Posted on 4/6/15 at 1:25 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
109887 posts
Posted on 4/6/15 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Similar to 'Gravity', Nolan fricks so much of the science up I couldn't enjoy the movie. Plotholes and inconsistencies throughout.


Oh yeah, scientific inaccuracies.

I'm sure you know a hell of a lot more than this guy and how it's been seen as the most scientifically accurate film set in space since 2001: Neil deGrasse Tyson

But yeah, I'm sure you've got as great of a knowledge about space as this guy does and how scientifically inaccurate it is.
Posted by BoostAddict
Member since Jun 2007
2993 posts
Posted on 4/6/15 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Oh yeah, scientific inaccuracies.

I'm sure you know a hell of a lot more than this guy and how it's been seen as the most scientifically accurate film set in space since 2001: Neil deGrasse Tyson

But yeah, I'm sure you've got as great of a knowledge about space as this guy does and how scientifically inaccurate it is.



Sorry but after following Tyson on twitter the last couple of yeasrs... I'm not sure he's playing with a full deck.

Sorry but I thought there were too many plot inconsistencies and "head scratchers". And yeah shithead... I know a few things about orbital mechanics.

Nolan should not have veered so far away from Kip Thorne's book... the physicist that did all of the calcs behind the science of the movie.

Another take on the movie from a physicist...

ETA...

Here's an article featuring Tyson where he kind of points out many of the movie's flaws, but was OK with some of them for story telling purposes... which I am as well, but just be consistent with it.

LINK
This post was edited on 4/6/15 at 1:53 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram