- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CST showed the LSU/ULL game on tape delay due to advertising obligations
Posted on 4/1/15 at 7:49 am to The Boat
Posted on 4/1/15 at 7:49 am to The Boat
quote:
Ronnie Rantz, on the broadcast for the game, made the decision to delay the broadcast of the game because of advertising obligations, he told The Advocate.
I'd be curious to know exactly what he means by this. As a guy that places ads for a living, all things being equal, if I had placed my ads to run in a live sporting event, only to then have them run in a god damned tape delay, I'd expect a drastic rate reduction at least. What I would have preferred would have been given the opportunity to have the ad run as placed or be credited for whatever did not run because the game was cut short.
If advertisers pay full price for a tape delayed game when they had purchased a live event, they ought to hire new buyers...
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News