Started By
Message

re: Joe Namath was a very, very overrated quarterback in the 60's and 70's...

Posted on 3/27/15 at 4:44 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96691 posts
Posted on 3/27/15 at 4:44 pm to
quote:



As you can see, being at 105% means he was about 5% above the league average. In these critical stat categories, Namath was very average. Good? Maybe. You might could make that case. But HOF worthy? No way.

Look at his adjusted stat line for 2012. That's a little better than average for the modern era. Namath of the 1960s equals Jay Cutler of 2012.

That's my point. Even comparing him to his own era he was only slightly above average
Posted by ClientNumber9
Member since Feb 2009
9339 posts
Posted on 3/27/15 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

lsupride87


And I'm 100% in agreement with your position.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram