Started By
Message

re: I still am not sure how UVa and Duke are both getting 1 seeds?

Posted on 3/9/15 at 11:14 am to
Posted by hoopsgalore
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2013
8659 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Duke has 3 losses to UVA's 2. Duke's losses to @NC State and vs. Miami drop them below UVA imo. It's about body of work, not head to head.


I know it is about body of work. You can listen to the talking heads and they'll say the same thing I did.

Right now, Duke has wins @Wisconsin, v. Michigan State (neutral), UNC x2, @Louisville, @UVA, and v. ND. You'll be hard-pressed to find a team in the country with a more impressive set of wins.

Duke is 6-1 v. RPI Top 25
Virginia is 5-2 v. RPI Top 25

Duke is 10-2 v. RPI Top 50
Virginia is 8-2 v. RPI Top 50

Duke is 17-3 v. RPI Top 100
Virginia is 15-2 v. RPI Top 100

Duke is 21-3 v. RPI Top 150
Virginia is 21-2 v. RPI Top 150

At this point, Duke is closer to a No. 1 seed lock than anyone not named Kentucky. The wins are just too impressive for their current seed to be 'tenuous.'
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25901 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 11:20 am to
quote:

At this point, Duke is closer to a No. 1 seed lock than anyone not named Kentucky. The wins are just too impressive for their current seed to be 'tenuous.'

First off, I don't think either are that tenuous. Both will likely get a 1 imo. There's no denying the quality of wins that Duke has.

UVA has wins @Maryland, @UNC, @ND, vs. Louisville, @ full strength VCU. Basically I think both should be 1 seeds.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 3/9/15 at 11:23 am to
That comp is Duke versus UVa, which says nothing about both getting one seeds. Expand your comp, leaving out Kentucky, who is a no-brainer 1-seed.

V. RPI top 25
Duke 6-1
UVa 5-2
Nova 6-1
Wisky 2-2
Zona 3-0

v. RPI top 50
Duke 10-2
UVa 8-2
Nova 11-1
Wisky 8-2
Zona 6-0

v. RPI top 100
Duke 17-3
UVa 15-2
Nova 15-2
Wisky 15-2
Zona 13-2

Considering the fact that Duke is the only team in that group without a conference title, I don't see how you can call them a 1-seed lock. Looking at those breakdowns, Villanova clearly has the best resume, and I'd argue Arizona has the second best. They don't have a lot of top 50 wins, but they are undefeated. And against the top 100, they have the same winning percentage as the other squads.

If Duke were running away on the metrics, I can see giving them a one seed over everyone despite the lack of a title, but I just don't see their resume as being considerably better than anyone else's save Wisconsin (who I just can't justify giving a one seed, which is a shame, because I like them better than any team in this grouping, and they are gonna get the Kentucky screw job).

If Duke wins the ACC tourney, I would give them the 1-seed over UVa, and I can see both of them getting one if both Nova and Zona fall in their tourneys. But right now, I'd still go UK, Nova, Zona, ACC champ.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram