- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bradycap freindly deal, Peyton takes 4 million pay cut, Drew.........
Posted on 3/5/15 at 9:28 am to Midget Death Squad
Posted on 3/5/15 at 9:28 am to Midget Death Squad
Technically speaking if we redid the deal this year and didn't touch what we saved(or only part of it) we could carry it over. So it really doesn't matter from that perspective if we did it this year or next.
What does happen next year is we have more leverage (threatening a very unlikely cut or dangling more guaranteed money next year). If we redid him this year any signing bonus would also be on this year's cap and without an extension it wouldn't be cost effective.
But next year it has to be an extension as a simple restructure is not possible.
Now there is also the fact that Brees is getting older and, while still playing at a very high level, has been on a slight downward slope. If we extend him this year we are locked into him good or bad for the next 3-4 years. Waiting a year gives us roster flexibility as far as what we can do at the position.
And following that we could very well just let him play the deal out and figure it out in 2017.
So it's not really about saving more this year as we have options that could save the same regardless. It's more about gaining leverage and keeping options open.
But you are right in that the Saints are the ones deciding to wait. And that could also put the fear of injury and no further payday in Brees' head. That is very good leverage to have. It's why players hate the franchise tag.
What does happen next year is we have more leverage (threatening a very unlikely cut or dangling more guaranteed money next year). If we redid him this year any signing bonus would also be on this year's cap and without an extension it wouldn't be cost effective.
But next year it has to be an extension as a simple restructure is not possible.
Now there is also the fact that Brees is getting older and, while still playing at a very high level, has been on a slight downward slope. If we extend him this year we are locked into him good or bad for the next 3-4 years. Waiting a year gives us roster flexibility as far as what we can do at the position.
And following that we could very well just let him play the deal out and figure it out in 2017.
So it's not really about saving more this year as we have options that could save the same regardless. It's more about gaining leverage and keeping options open.
But you are right in that the Saints are the ones deciding to wait. And that could also put the fear of injury and no further payday in Brees' head. That is very good leverage to have. It's why players hate the franchise tag.
This post was edited on 3/5/15 at 9:32 am
Posted on 3/5/15 at 9:48 am to bonethug0108
This all makes sense to me. If next year they can do a full resign/extension, then there's no reason to restructure this year. A restructure would add years at an inflated cost when they could get a better deal overall if they wait.
Posted on 3/6/15 at 11:36 am to bonethug0108
quote:
Technically speaking if we redid the deal this year and didn't touch what we saved(or only part of it) we could carry it over. So it really doesn't matter from that perspective if we did it this year or next.
What does happen next year is we have more leverage (threatening a very unlikely cut or dangling more guaranteed money next year). If we redid him this year any signing bonus would also be on this year's cap and without an extension it wouldn't be cost effective.
But next year it has to be an extension as a simple restructure is not possible.
Now there is also the fact that Brees is getting older and, while still playing at a very high level, has been on a slight downward slope. If we extend him this year we are locked into him good or bad for the next 3-4 years. Waiting a year gives us roster flexibility as far as what we can do at the position.
And following that we could very well just let him play the deal out and figure it out in 2017.
So it's not really about saving more this year as we have options that could save the same regardless. It's more about gaining leverage and keeping options open.
But you are right in that the Saints are the ones deciding to wait. And that could also put the fear of injury and no further payday in Brees' head. That is very good leverage to have. It's why players hate the franchise tag.
Exactly. The organization wants flexibility in the future more than they want cap room now. One thing I have learned about free agency the Saints (Loomis) always comes up with the money. They might not spend it wisely, but they always find the money.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)