quote:
He had to do a lot of good things (and overcome some bad things) to get his team to be in that position. And, as others have said he had to do a lot during the regular season and playoffs to even be there.

WHy do you take my entire premise as a knock on Brady? I'm saying I'd think just as highly of him if he had 3 titles compared to 4 or even 6? Isn't that me being pro-Brady?

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by rintintin

Life is Life

Member since Nov 2008

16227 posts

Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:54 pm to shel311

quote:
No, the 1 play is my exact logic

Using one play and one player as your logic is bad logic. You are trying to make a very bold statement, that SB rings are meaningless, by using one player and one play as an example.

Maybe if you want to just say "this is why winning this SB is irrelevant in determining Brady's legacy", then you have a valid argument.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Methuselah

On da Riva

Member since Jan 2005

23350 posts

Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:59 pm to shel311

quote:
quote:
I think the flaw in your logic is that you are concentrating on one play.
No, the 1 play is my exact logic

Except you didn't say the one play is irrelevant, you said Super Bowl Rings are "mostly" irrelevant. It is a completely different thing to say that that one play is irrelevant to his greatness as a quarterback than it is to say super bowl rings are irrelevant to his greatness.

quote:
WHy do you take my entire premise as a knock on Brady? I'm saying I'd think just as highly of him if he had 3 titles compared to 4 or even 6? Isn't that me being pro-Brady?

??? I don't think I said anything about your premise being a knock on Brady. I didn't even think along those lines. I just think you are conflating whether one play matters with whether a Superbowl ring matters. They are different things entirely.

1 ...

Report Post

More Sports - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board