Started By
Message

re: Tankless vs. Tank Water Heaters

Posted on 1/18/15 at 2:23 pm to
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
21632 posts
Posted on 1/18/15 at 2:23 pm to
tankless costs twice as much to purchase. also, i case of breakage of unit, it loses as much water as a tank.

i was going tankless because our tank in attic "broke" but was told the house would have been flooded if it was a tankless also. to replace with another tank was 1400, tankless would have been 3200.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
23810 posts
Posted on 1/18/15 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

told the house would have been flooded if it was a tankless also.

that's why i'm going outdoor... plus, no need to ventilate it if it's outdoor...

quote:

to replace with another tank was 1400, tankless would have been 3200.

retrofitting a tankless is much more expensive... really not worth it, IMO...

but i'm building a new house... not retrofitting....
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram