Started By
Message

re: Interstate Cable Barriers

Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:57 am to
Posted by PhiTiger1764
Lurker since Aug 2003
Member since Oct 2009
13958 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:57 am to
Extensive research and crash testing has been done with cable barriers. The use of cable barriers are based on ADT, clear zone requirements, median width, crash history/severity, and a host of other things.

A lot of what you are spewing is simply garbage based on your bias as a motorcyclist. You simply don't know what you're talking about.
Posted by AndyCBR
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2012
7578 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 6:44 pm to
quote:

Extensive research and crash testing has been done with cable barriers. The use of cable barriers are based on ADT, clear zone requirements, median width, crash history/severity, and a host of other things.

A lot of what you are spewing is simply garbage based on your bias as a motorcyclist. You simply don't know what you're talking about.



You're entitled to your opinion and so am I. That doesn't make it garbage. As far as my opinion being based on a motorcyclists view, that is certainly part of it. As a point of reference the cable barrier systems are not allowed in Europe due to the hazard they present to motorcyclists.

Many of my statements are mirrored by the Federal Highway Administration:

LINK

"While cable median barriers have low installation costs, they can be to maintain due to the number of crashes that result in damage. Even though the cost of a crash is generally low, the system receives some damage from even slight hits, and needs to be repaired to provide optimum performance. Also, even low tension cable does not always go down on impact. It is more likely than high tension cable to go down after a hit."

A Kansas DOT official also questions their overall effectiveness here:

LINK

"“Cable barriers are not benign. They don’t solve all the problems and can in some situations create problems,” KDOT Secretary Deb Miller said Friday. “So our deliberations must center on whether they provide more benefits or create more liabilities. The question isn’t: Do we have the money? The question is: Is this the right strategy?”

Caltrans agrees:

LINK

"The California Department of Transportation used the cable rail system as their standard during the early 1960s, but abandoned it by 1978. The agency stated in its 1997 Cable Median Barriers Report that the cable barrier is "the least expensive to install, but it has had the worst accident experience and is the most expensive to maintain.""

For someone to state, as you do, emphatically, that cable barriers are without a doubt the only and best answer to highway safety demonstrates your lack of knowledge on the subject matter.

Spending of this type is a hallmark of our federal government. Low initial cost and high maintenance costs forever. An increase in safety in one metric, and a decrease in safety in many others.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram