- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chavis might be gone but AD Alleva wants his $400k!
Posted on 1/1/15 at 7:21 pm to thelawnwranglers
Posted on 1/1/15 at 7:21 pm to thelawnwranglers
LSU needs to let it go regardless of any legal points. Move on and do not draw attention to how we lost Chavis.
2
Posted on 1/1/15 at 7:25 pm to GeorgeWest
If it is a slam dunk case and he owes LSU 400k bc the contract rolls to 12/31/2015 I absolutely want him to go after it.
As a public institution he might not have a choice.
As a public institution he might not have a choice.
Posted on 1/1/15 at 7:31 pm to GeorgeWest
I haven't read the contract, but even if Chavis negotiated and signed a contract to provide services elsewhere in2015, it is HIGHLY unlikely to be breach of any enforceable contract with LSU.
Here's the bigger point:
We knew the terms were expiring and asked everybody to re up.
Everybody BUT Chavis did, signed their contracts and sent them back.
We knew two weeks ago TAM offered Chavis.
It does not Appear Alleva began implementing a plan B to find a new DC until Chavis formally served out the contract.
THAT is what Alleva should be fired for, not for losing the existing DC who was very expensive and whose consent was beyond our control.
Had we begun and implemented Plan B, we wouldn't look so stupid today and would likely have something to tell recruits.
Here's the bigger point:
We knew the terms were expiring and asked everybody to re up.
Everybody BUT Chavis did, signed their contracts and sent them back.
We knew two weeks ago TAM offered Chavis.
It does not Appear Alleva began implementing a plan B to find a new DC until Chavis formally served out the contract.
THAT is what Alleva should be fired for, not for losing the existing DC who was very expensive and whose consent was beyond our control.
Had we begun and implemented Plan B, we wouldn't look so stupid today and would likely have something to tell recruits.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News