- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Top 5 "over-covered" (read: wrong) Vatican stories of the year
Posted on 12/28/14 at 8:51 pm to TigerPride10
Posted on 12/28/14 at 8:51 pm to TigerPride10
quote:
Serious question: why not? If his word is infallible and he speaks for God, does he not have the ability to change catholic doctrine?
Because God has more authority than the Pope and things of Dogma are unchangeable. At-least in the things he brought up the only thing he would have the power to "change" would be birth control. But Humane Vitae has closed that discussion in the Church.
It's pointless to discuss "changes" in Church doctrine when it is unlikely well almost impossible that it will happen.
1
Posted on 12/28/14 at 9:26 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:Wasn't "Humane Vitae" written by a pope? And the whole be fruitful and multiply came from Genesis which I have been told by poli board religious scholars, should not be taken literally. Odd that that one sentence is observed so strictly.
Because God has more authority than the Pope and things of Dogma are unchangeable. At-least in the things he brought up the only thing he would have the power to "change" would be birth control. But Humane Vitae has closed that discussion in the Church.
It's pointless to discuss "changes" in Church doctrine when it is unlikely well almost impossible that it will happen.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News