Started By
Message

re: Teams calling about Wilson Chandler

Posted on 12/26/14 at 10:54 am to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61624 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 10:54 am to
quote:

Have to use it as a trade asset, IMO.


Expirings are not trade assets unless you're taking on a known bad contract. For instance if we actually wanted Joe Johnson. Other than that, you get paid to take on useless players which isn't the stage of development this team is at.

If Demps and Monty don't get fired this offseason I expect Gordon to get stretched or packaged with a future pick. It's really the only way to fill the hole at SF short of trading Ryno or Reke (both of which are on the table too IMO).
Posted by MrWiseGuy
Member since Dec 2009
27439 posts
Posted on 12/26/14 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Expirings are not trade assets unless you're taking on a known bad contract. For instance if we actually wanted Joe Johnson. Other than that, you get paid to take on useless players which isn't the stage of development this team is at.


The Pelicans have virtually no wiggle room because of the contracts of Tyreke, Jrue, Davis and either Asik or Anderson or both after the 2015-16 season.

They have to use Gordon's contract as an asset, even if that means taking on a bad contract; they're stuck.
This post was edited on 12/26/14 at 11:09 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram