Started By
Message

re: Post office beats UPS and FedEx for packages

Posted on 12/24/14 at 12:13 pm to
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28893 posts
Posted on 12/24/14 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

Which is the problem with government planning. Market based industry >>> govt funding.
If there is such an inherent problem, how was it able to work successfully for over a century? And how would the market handle the unprofitable nature of the requirement of universal postal service? Here's how: government funding.

And in this case, government planning is working perfectly. Because the plan was to destroy the USPS in order to privatize it.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
113718 posts
Posted on 12/24/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

If there is such an inherent problem, how was it able to work successfully for over a century?


It didn't. It was a failure from the start. In early US history the post office management was a place for political leaders to place supporters (the spoils system).

When private alternatives popped up in the 1800s they were squashed by laws designed to make them non competitive. The post office had govt on their side. The private start ups had no chance.
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/24/14 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

And in this case, government planning is working perfectly. Because the plan was to destroy the USPS in order to privatize it.

That really SHOULD be the plan. There's literally no reason to publicly fund it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram