quote:
So is this one of those 'nah see what had happened was I was actually joking' moments then? Because if not your post on the first page clearly shows otherwise

No. I said all teams that aren'y undefeated are in some way lucky. and the whole point was that it doesn't diminish them. You think it does and i don't.

You like quotes. Especially taking them out of context. Quote me where i say luck makes a champion less worthy.

quote:
Except no, no it couldn't.

Yes it could. Any team that wasn't undefeated could be called lucky.

quote:
You asked me why the 2007 season gets called lucky and the 2003 season doesn't. Like I told your fellow pumper, it's not my problem if you can't handle the factual answer to that question.

You told me why it is ok to shite on the 2007 championship. It was obviously lucky, but lots of teams get lucky in some way or another. You decided what is more or less lucky.

quote:
So, once again, you suck too right?

Like i said. I never said the 2003 team was worth any less or that Nick Saban was less of a coach. I just said it was lucky. You imply that luck is a bad thing that makes a team less worthy. I see the same amount of trophys.

Both are great. But you would rather shite on miles than enjoy an accomplishment. You suck.

This post was edited on 12/7/14 at 2:02 am

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Nuts4LSU

Washington, DC

Member since Oct 2003

25468 posts

Posted on 12/7/14 at 2:06 am to SammyTiger

quote:
Any team that wasn't undefeated could be called lucky.

And even some that were. 2004 USC was lucky that OU finished undefeated and kept Auburn out of the NC game.

For the record, one of the luckiest national championships in history was Alabama's in 2011, and 2012 wasn't far behind it. You look at the upsets that had to happen for both of those, and they far eclipse WVU losing a rivalry game to Pitt.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Open Your Eyes

Member since Nov 2012

9252 posts

Posted on 12/7/14 at 2:14 am to SammyTiger

quote:
No. I said all teams that aren'y undefeated are in some way lucky. and the whole point was that it doesn't diminish them. You think it does and i don't.

Is this some kind of bizarro world, or do you really just not remember what you posted?

No, that is not what you said. For like the 3rd time, this is what you said:

Or getting to play the #3 team in the polls because the BCS loved Oklahoma for some reason.

quote:
Yes it could. Any team that wasn't undefeated could be called lucky.

But the reasons the 2007 team is referred to as lucky are exclusive to only that season.

quote:
You told me why it is ok to shite on the 2007 championship.

Like I said, its not my problem that you can't handle a factual answer to a question.

quote:
It was obviously lucky, but lots of teams get lucky in some way or another. You decided what is more or less lucky.

I didn't decide anything. It is what it is.

Are you going to get mad at me too if I said a guy that wins the lottery is more lucky than a guy that calls a coin flip correctly?

quote:
Like i said. I never said the 2003 team was worth any less or that Nick Saban was less of a coach.

I don't recall stating any of that.

quote:
I ust said it was lucky

Wait, so now it's lucky again? Correct me if I'm wrong, but your last official stance on this was "it's not luck, it's just football." You've flip flopped on the several times though, so I may not be completely up to date.

quote:
You imply that luck is a bad thing that makes a team less worthy.

Actually that's a concept that you introduced in this thread. The first poster you responded to said miles was lucky for winning in 2007. You took that and ran with it being a dis, and now here we are.

The whole pumping gets confusing thing started out as a joke, but now I'm really starting to believe it.