Started By
Message
locked post

Poll Question: Eric Garner

Posted on 12/5/14 at 3:01 am
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 3:01 am
I want to run a quick poll

Up Vote - If there should have been an indictment

Down Vote - If there should not have been an indictment
Posted by Zantrix
Parts Unknown
Member since Nov 2009
7940 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 3:01 am to
What do we do if we don't care?
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 3:46 am to
Yes IMHO there should have been an indictment. whether he was found guilty or not it would lay out all the facts and laws involved and help end some of the ridicules speculation going on. Having a trial also sends a signal that cops are not above the law.
Posted by Tyler9258
Auburn
Member since Dec 2013
4204 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 4:01 am to
You should comply with what cops say, right or wrong. It'll get straightened out if they're wrong.


With that being said, I don't think cops should just be choking motherfrickers out left and right and that be an okay thing.
Posted by lsuohiofan
Alliance,Ohio
Member since Oct 2011
1504 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 5:39 am to
Bad law and that is the issue. No high taxes no black market cigarette sales.

Stupid people for staying, They need to move out of New York!
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89808 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 5:53 am to
Indictment, but no evidence of racial motivation.
Posted by TOKEN
Member since Feb 2014
11990 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:11 pm to
FYI, I found out last night that the US is the only country that still has grand jury's .

I thought it was interesting every other country has abandoned GJ's.
Posted by ljhog
Lake Jackson, Tx.
Member since Apr 2009
19129 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:32 pm to
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112799 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:35 pm to
No indictment.
When the cops tell you to do something you do it. If you think they are wrong you can file a grievance later.
Posted by AUin02
Member since Jan 2012
4283 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 12:47 pm to
Should have been an indictment.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99851 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 1:04 pm to
Because I do not know what was presented to the GJ, and what charge was sought, I cannot say.

If you are asking based solely on the video, and if the charge sought was a murder charge that required intent, then I will be voting no.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 1:50 pm to
I voted No

Simply because the GJ heard more than any of us and they decided not toso I cant argue with that
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 1:53 pm to
I voted No

Simply because the GJ heard more than any of us and they decided not toso I cant argue with that
Posted by Radiojones
The Twilight Zone
Member since Feb 2007
10728 posts
Posted on 12/5/14 at 5:08 pm to
I would need to see the evidence the the Grand Jury saw before having an opinion on the matter.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram