Started By
Message

re: All these "libertarians"

Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:49 am to
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

but there's no doubt that the only reason the grand jury did not proceed was b/c he was a cop
Or, perhaps they saw the case was shite.

Your "no doubt" assertion is quite simply false. Don't confuse your own view with something that has "no doubt".
Posted by Bayou Sam
Istanbul
Member since Aug 2009
5921 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Your "no doubt" assertion is quite simply false. Don't confuse your own view with something that has "no doubt".


The prosecutor did not want the case to proceed. Why else present exculpatory evidence to the Grand Jury, and tell them falsehoods about the law?

Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Your "no doubt" assertion is quite simply false. Don't confuse your own view with something that has "no doubt".

Maybe OP is saying that a lot fewer non-cop cases should go to trial, and that cop cases are handled measurably differently? It's possible. Would like to see evidence justifying this "there's no doubt the only reason" claim though.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram