Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:11 pm to
Posted by Rawdawgs
Member since Dec 2007
910 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:11 pm to
[quote]Gun confiscation is creepy and probably authoritarian, but you will definitely see a decline is shootings/mass shootings[/quote

Nope.
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
19404 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:11 pm to
LINK

quote:

Since 1967, homicide figures for England and Wales have been adjusted to exclude any cases which do not result in conviction, or where the person is not prosecuted on grounds of self defence or otherwise. This reduces the apparent number of homicides by between 13 per cent and 15 per cent.
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
8397 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:12 pm to
I wonder if the government is compensating them nicely for taking their property and protecting their fellow man?

What a croc, I hope the law get ruled unconstitutional.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80441 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:13 pm to
I didn't read the article, but is there an appeals process or any type of due process?
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

just need any doctor, or one with an agenda,


No. Here's the law:

quote:

VI. MENTAL HYGIENE LAW - 9.46 REFERRAL
The Safe Act added a new section 9.46 to the Mental Hygiene Law that requires a mental health professional to report, as soon as practicable,
That's 1

quote:

to his or her director of community services, any person under his or her care if the professional believes such person “is likely to engage in
conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others.”
The director of community services must, if he or she agrees with this determination
That's 2

quote:

report the subject person to DCJS personnel, who will make an initial screening to determine if the subject potentially has a NYS-issued firearms license or has applied for one. If so, DCJS will notify the
State Police to confirm the existence of the license and the licensing authority will be notified so they can make a determination


That's 3
quote:

as to whether to suspend or revoke the subject’s license.
The licensing authority, and the appropriate local law enforcement agency, will handle the suspension and the recovery of any weapons in the same manner as they do now in the event the licensing authority revokes a firearms license.


If three people, including your own psychiatrist, believe you're nuts and a threat to others, you probably shouldn't have a gun.

Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33391 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

I'd rather be stabbed by a butter knife than shot.


What about blown up? Bc if someone wants to commit mass murder, they have all the tools they need to make a small explosive and take out a portion of a school cafeteria or shopping mall. Lunatics gonna lunatic.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16805 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

just need a doctor to report you. just need any doctor, or one with an agenda, to tell the state you're a lunatic


I have no problem with this. Think about the old days in a small town. Everyone knew the villiage idiot/psycho and they certainly wouldnt put him in charge of the armory.

All this is doing is identifying the modern day villiage idiot and not allowing him to be a threat.

If youre worried about this, chances are you are the villiage idiot. You should be worried.
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 4:23 pm
Posted by GeeOH
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2013
13376 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

No clearly defined standard, just someone's word



Yep, right up to the point that a hospital organization or doctor's practice is sued for about $100 million for making an unsubstantiated claim.
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:24 pm to
12 people wrongly convict people all the time

So what?

3 people can think a guy is suicidal without him saying anything definitive...taken

There no standard, whether you admit it or not. Even if that passes for you, it will be applied inconsistently. Any 3 will do

And

quote:

quote: to his or her director of community services, any person under his or her care if the professional believes such person “is likely to engage in conduct that would result in serious harm to self or others.” The director of community services must, if he or she agrees with this determination
I wonder how often that happens. You ever run a chit up a chain of command?

So it immediately goes to step 3 where a politician, gee that's so smart, makes the final determination

And it is rarely the same 3 people

I'd love to see how many of these reported individuals don't get to step 3, as you call it, I'd also love to see how many different therapists have reported individuals


If you think that's a fair or air tight standard to deprive someone of their rights then frick you
Posted by Blue Velvet
Apple butter toast is nice
Member since Nov 2009
20112 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:28 pm to
The UK has a higher violent crime rate.
Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

In UK, only 14 people died of gunshot wounds last yea


I couldn't find anything more recent but here are the figures for 2007:

Australia: 30 homicides by firearms; Number of firearms: 3,050,000

Canada: 173 homicides by firearms; Number of firearms: 9,950,000

England: 41 homicides by firearms; Number of firearms: 3,400,000

Honduras: 5201 homicides by firearms; Number of firearms: 500,000

US: 9,146 homicides by firearms; Number of firearms: 270,000,000

• The US has the highest gun ownership rate in the world - an average of 88 per 100 people. That puts it first in the world for gun ownership - and even the number two country, Yemen, has significantly fewer - 54.8 per 100 people

• But the US does not have the worst firearm murder rate - that prize belongs to Honduras, El Salvador and Jamaica. In fact, the US is number 28, with a rate of 2.97 per 100,000 people

• Puerto Rico tops the world's table for firearms murders as a percentage of all homicides - 94.8%. It's followed by Sierra Leone in Africa and Saint Kitts and Nevis in the Caribbean

Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33391 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:35 pm to
Right. Bc who wants to be the public employee who doesn't rubber stamp the process for the guy who then goes and murders someone with his gun. I'd bet that most go through with little thought. All on the opinion of a psychiatrist who may not even have treated you for long. There is so much controversy within the psych community surrounding certain drugs and symptoms of mental disorders. That's why it's important to find a dr that's right for you as an individual. Go to the wrong doc and all of a sudden your constitutional rights are null. Sweet.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10591 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

There no standard

Just out of curiosity, what type of standard do you think would be acceptable? The "harm to self or others" is a pretty common standard used in psychiatry to temporarily take away ones rights. That isn't new.
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33391 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:39 pm to
Don't those cases have to go before a judge before their rights are suspended?
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:40 pm to
Standard term to describe infinitely varying situations

Posted by Vegas Bengal
Member since Feb 2008
26344 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

The UK has a higher violent crime rate.
Don't think it's higher "violent" crime rate

But Hail's 14 figure was correct for 2011:

Homicides by firearms:

UK: 14 Ranked 39th.
US: 9,369 Ranked 4th. 669 times more than United Kingdom

Violent crime murders:

UK: 722 Ranked 34th.
US: 12,996 Ranked 9th. 18 times more than United Kingdom

Total Crimes per 1000:

UK: 109.96 Ranked 4th. 3 times more than United States
US: 41.29 Ranked 22nd.

But how violent can those crimes be when comparing this:

UK: 78,753 prisoners Ranked 15th.
US: 2.02 million prisoners Ranked 1st. 26 times more than United Kingdom

Whatever crimes they're committing in England, they're not locking them up like we are LINK
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 4:43 pm
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80441 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Standard term to describe infinitely varying situations


Yeah, because the very nature of the law is to try to describe the subjectivity and complexity of the human experience in black and white, objective word that have concrete definitions.

Every standard written can be described as:

quote:

Standard term to describe infinitely varying situations


ETA: That's why we have lawyers, and judges, and people, and juries, and appeals, and due process
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 4:48 pm
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10591 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

Don't those cases have to go before a judge before their rights are suspended?

Nope.
Posted by onmymedicalgrind
Nunya
Member since Dec 2012
10591 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Standard term to describe infinitely varying situations

Like...
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 4:49 pm to
anywhere on the spectrum from

"sometimes I think there's no point to life"

to

"I'm going to go kill a shitzillion people"

and the determination is made subjectively by the doctor..."it is my determination that"

oh, well if you say so...STAMP

surely as either a resident or medical student you realize that there are innumerable incompetent, unethical, and/or untruthful doctors.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram