Started By
Message

re: Recruiting Dual Threat QBs and why it's hard

Posted on 12/3/14 at 12:43 pm to
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

None of whom would be describes as "dual threat" by most people.


Russell Wilson ran a 4.55. He was labeled as a dual-threat QB in HS.

Drew had over 500 yards rushing his senior year (Jefferson's highest was 123, Herb Tyler's highest was 279)

quote:

They are just guys, not unlike Aaron Rogers, who are pass first but can run a bit.
But, I acknowledge that is a fine distinction.


Which is my point. You want to recruit that athleticism and develop the tendencies

quote:

I want a QB, can do the statue thing if he must. Who, if forced to stay in the pocket by a good front 7, doesn't suddenly become useless. WAY too many supposedly "dual threat" guys become ZERO threat the moment their running is stymied.


I completely agree. Arm talent should be the #1 criteria.
This post was edited on 12/3/14 at 12:48 pm
Posted by ShortyRob
Member since Oct 2008
82116 posts
Posted on 12/3/14 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

I completely agree. Arm talent should be the #1 criteria.


It occurs to me that I framed this improperly a bit earlier in the thread.

Here's the bottom line. I think that when evaluating a QB, you should first pretend you absolutely don't give a shite if he can run. Evaluating as if you plan to use him like Tom Brady.

The running should be a COMPLETE ad on. Alas, I think many people evaluate these guys where the evaluation becomes a sliding scale.

IE, "if he's a 10 runner, he can be a 5 passer but if he's a 6 runner, he needs to be a 7 passer".

Um. NOOOOOOOO! Rate that mother fricker like you expect him to perpetually play with turf toe!!!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram